Genki Japanese and Culture School
Hayashi Building 2F, Shimizuchō (Kawaramachidōri) 454-1, Shimogyō-ku, Kyōto-shi, Kyoto, Kyoto 600-8025, Japan
Genki Japanese and Culture School
Nghe, phát biểu, phát âm, đọc, viết, từ vựng và Ngữ pháp
You can choose from the following class times:
Lịch học có thể thay đổi tùy theo nhu cầu và theo mùa.
Study at Genki Japanese School for 10 weeks, at a big discount off our standard Japanese tuition cost! This special course is one of our most popular items.You'll study 20 class hours per week - two classes focus on grammar, and two classes focus on applying your skills to real-world situations. Classes have a maximum of 8 students, and focus on communication skills for daily life, rather than academic Japanese.
*This course does not include cultural activities for students. If you wish to include cultural activities in your reservation, please book the Standard Japanese course plus cultural activities.
** Complete beginners need to be able to read the Hiragana alphabet before starting.
Trung bình | 6 sinh viên |
Tối đa | 8 sinh viên |
Độ tuổi | 14 tuổi và lớn hơn |
Trung bình | 25 tuổi (22 vào mùa hè) |
Trường GenkiJACS nằm ở trung tâm Kyōto và là một trong những trường học danh tiếng nhất ở Nhật Bản. Trường học chuyên đào tạo Tiếng Nhật cho những sinh viên quốc tế như bạn. Sỹ số lớp học tối đa của trường là rất nhỏ (tối đa 8 sinh viên) và tất cả giáo viên đều là người nói Tiếng Nhật bản ngữ Họ cũng là những giáo viên và các thành viên ban giám hiệu vô cùng thân thiện, những người sẽ dành sự quan tâm tốt nhất cho bạn trong thời gian ở ở Kyoto.
Quốc tịch và độ tuổi tại Genki Japanese and Culture School thay đổi tùy theo thời gian, khóa học và cấp độ. Tính theo năm, độ tuổi trung bình là 25. Vào mùa hè, độ tuổi trung bình là 22.
Trường học có sinh viên đến từ khắp nơi trên thế giới, bao gồm:
Trường GenkiJACS nghỉ làm việc vào các ngày lễ nêu dưới đây. Trường không dạy bù cho những ngày lễ này, vì vậy hãy bảo đảm là bạn chọn ngày khai giảng thích hợp.
I had a fantastic home stay experience. School was really good for teaching and practice, but as someone coming back to school style setting after 20 years, some prep materials to cover gaps in learning would have been really helpful for self study to get the most out of my time. Being thrown into class is helpful for immersion but I had to relearn some basics I forgot or didn’t use through mistakes rather than any review type of support. Not being able to use English I relied on my fellow students to catch me up. Which was helpful. The location is excellent and having different teachers everyday helped get different teaching styles and ways to learn.
Xem chi tiết » Đọc tiếp...The teachers and staff were very kind, patient and helpful. It is School so with that comes homework. Be prepared to spend at least an hour on it each day maybe longer. Learn to write hiragana before you arrive and at least recognize katakana! Yes, really.
The location was good. Easy to get around…. The public transport is easy. An IC card makes riding the transport and buying food etc at conbinis very simple. No fiddling with change. During my stay there were two natl. holidays and the school organized events were quite nice. Also, on occasion they have movie night which was fun. It is Kyoto so if you’re interested in culture/history then it’s all around you.
As for housing, I had a difficult situation which I stuck with for three weeks before I changed. I was trying to “be a good guest”. Frankly, I should have said something at the end of week one and gotten help from the school to change. That being said, make sure you communicate honestly about how that part is going for you. It affects how you experience the rest of your time there. The school staff has seen a lot of housing issues go by. They won’t be upset or judgmental if you talk with them honestly about your needs.
I enjoyed meeting so many interesting people and making friends. If I had the time I would have been happy to stay longer. Knowing what I know now, I think I would have added a conversation class to my curriculum.
Overall, I was happy with my time there and felt supported and encouraged. I’m nearly 68 years old now so being welcomed and encouraged is a good thing.
The classes are very interesting and informative, the teachers know how to include us and be interesting. The Kyoto location is very nice and cozy and the location is great. There are many activities to choose from, they are all very interesting and informative. The thing I liked the most was meeting so many people and practicing Japanese with them. The fact that the classes are held entirely in Japanese is also very informative.
Xem chi tiết » Đọc tiếp...Classes - at beginning was very crowded, a lot of people in a small area. But they followed the schedule closely and each session last what its predicted time.
Teachers- as in any other school there are very good and bad teachers. But, the good thing is that they only speak Japanese.
Location - it is a great location in Kyoto, but rooms have no windows and are small. I use masks all the time.
Activities - we are having classes on Grammar, Reading, and Kanji. I did see any social activities.
Housing - was complicated, as the Housing office in Japan didn't inform the host family that my diet should be gluten free. Also, I sent an email to the host family in this family on this regard, but she didn't read it. So, upon arrival, I explained about my diet, but they didn't understand well, and in 4 different occasions they gave me food with gluten. I noticed and try to explain to them. At the end, I only ate rice and one egg every day and bought my own food. Since I had been in Japan before, I brought from US a lot of gluten free food, which helped a lot.
What I liked - the administration under Victorio is very efficient and they are willing to do their very best to help you and sort out your problems.
What I didn't like - some policies in place. For example, you have one hour to do a written test. In the middle of the exam you need to stop and go to another room to do a speaking test, which cuts totally your way of thinking. When, you come back, they say you have one 5 minutes left to finish the written test. It is a very frustrating experience. In America, test time is sacred and they do not interrupt you for any reason! Also, the written materials, specially the furigana, are done in very very small font, which is very difficult to read. For me, it takes a lot of time to read them and I need augmentation lens. Also, they do a lot of handwriting on the board which is very difficult to read. They should incorporate more technology into teaching.
Review of Japanese Genki Jacs
Genki Jacs website promotes absolute beginners classes, where they cater for students “who have never spoken a word of Japanese”. They promote small classes where there is “more attention from teachers, making it easier to focus on students specific needs in an intimate and comfortable environment.”
From these statements, a certain expectation was set regarding the level and pace of the courses offered. More specifically, absolute beginners classes only take enrolements on the first Monday of the month; whcih again, set certain expectations up for what might be offered. My recent experience did not reflect what was promoted and at best could be described as disappointing.
The lack of comprehension of any style of pedagogy, personalized learning, student focused learning tasks and lesson progression demonstrated the inexperience of the teaching staff and overall curriculum focus of the school. Lessons were not adjusted or tailored to meet student needs, showed very limited reflection of student abilities and progression, despite the rigorous and strict adherence homework and data collection.
This was not an environment for adult learners to enrich learning, build skills and understanding, but an imperialist age left over education based on fear and shame. The environment was neither intimate nor comfortable, unless this meant cramped sitting space and tiny rooms.
Perhaps the school is indicative of the entire Japanese Education System and expectations; however, being an international school, catering for students who are from around the globe, it might be expected that a pedagogy aligning with international adult learning would have been implemented, rather than being reflective of the expectations and culture within a local junior high school.
While there was a miscommunication regarding the need to know hiragana before starting; this in no way caters for the promotion of ‘not knowing any Japanese at all’. Simply being able to identify a symbol does not equate to understanding its sound nor how it relates when placed next to other sounds to blend sounds into words. Fluency of sounds is a skill only reached through rigorous repetition, identification, modelling, sight and sound words and vocal exploration. While an adult might be expected to have a quicker uptake of sounds and fluency based on their prior experience of learning to read and speak over several years as a young child, this is not a process that can be achieved in months, much less weeks – and for many adult learners can take many months; dependent up their own phenetic skill awareness and confidence.
Within the first week at the school, the class was expected to have reading fluency of not only hiragana, but the introduction of Katakana. Reading fluency refers to the ability to read quickly, smoothly, easily, and with expression. To read fluently, a reader must understand how the symbols on the page (the letters) are related to the sounds of the language, how those sounds are blended together to form words, what the words mean, and what the words together in a sentence mean. This skill is something that is built over time and practice.
My first week was spent with two other students in the alleged absolute beginner class. Our first lesson saw the teacher write a sentence in hiragana on the board and ask us to read it. In no version of an educative environment would a beginner reader and speaker be expected not only to identify the symbols but to blend and speak them out loud on the first week. The expectations of the beginner class were unrealistic and not in touch with the individual needs of the class, particularly when the range of abilities was so wide. The other two students in my class were clearly advanced, having the ability to write and reading katakana and hiragana, and be able to construct blended sentences using a variety of known words and concepts.
I openly cried in and out of class out of frustration and helplessness as I was shamed and left further and further behind. I was not in a beginner class but with two other students who were confident Japanese speakers and could read fluently. I felt unwelcome and extremely uncomfortable.
At this point, I would like to highlight my strong resilience and adaptability. I draw on a lifetime of high resilience, having experienced personal traumas, deaths, natural disasters and emotional turmoil. I am an experienced and highly skilled world traveler, having backpacked and lived in much of Europe and parts of Asia for over 10 years. I do not say lightly that after a week here, I was planning on leaving and my emotional outbursts were not a case of culture shock or lack of resilience.
The lack of understanding of the mechanics of education was highlighted in every aspect of the class structure. An example was the use of homework for each class. This was not used to assess a students understanding; because if it was, there was no indication that lessons were adjusted to cater for the misunderstandings. On multiple occasions, I was unable to complete parts of the homework and wrote notes on the sheets for the marking teacher to read when it was handed in. These were not addressed, nor were they reviewed. The solution to challenges in keeping up with class content was to give more homework, to the point of it being hours of work outside of the class – and much of it incomprehendable.
The materials were of extremely poor quality. Photocopied sheets were often blurry and writing so tiny, it was often difficult to ascertain what was written. The images were ambiguous and it was often difficult to understand what the activity was requiring.
There was no indication at the school of application of pedagogy of adult learners and adult learning styles. With the website promoting beginner courses suited to a four week commitment, there was little indication that this was the case. It appeared that there were lessons which were rigorously adhered to, with little personalization or room for adjustments or revision.
My highlight of the week was the culture classes; which were well thought out, engaging and varied in activities and interest areas. The tour leaders were interesting and willing to share their experiences and knowledge with the group.
The schools central location is easy to access and surrounded by wonderful cultural spots. While the course facilitators were not teachers and did not draw upon any tools or skills to adapt lessons to suit a range of abilities, they were not unpleasant. However they were not approachable, nor warm. I suspect that it is culturally inappropriate for teachers to build any sort of relationship with students, even adult aged ones. The classes were on the whole ,silent with no encouragement for student input or personalization. This promoted a lack of trust within the classroom, fear and isolation.
While I write this as a reflection of my own experiences, I know that I am not an isolated case as a beginner learner. I am aware that the school caters for advanced speakers and learners and perhaps this is where their expertise lays. I would suggest that this school is not suited to beginners of the language. If they were to continue promoting this, then they might look at engaging a qualified teacher from primary school who teachers learning to read and speak ( 4 – 6 year olds) and engage in some of the pedagogy surrounding phonetic awareness, reading and writing.
I would suggest that if knowledge of Hiragana writing and reading was a prerequisite to enrolling that this be something that i s managed WELL before arriving and done online or in an exam situation or similar.
Dear Annie,
First of all thank you very much for your review.
We are always happy to receive feedback for both the positive and the negative of our courses.
Negative reviews help us keep improving all the time so we are grateful.
Our courses are actually designed for complete beginners who can already read the hiragana alphabet. Learning to read the hiragana alphabet before starting is our requirement for all levels, including complete beginners and that is clearly stated in our website and we always remind everyone when booking.
If a student joins our complete beginner class without that hiragana knowledge then it will be very difficult for them that is why we are always very noisy with the requirement.
Were you not reminded about it by Language International? We did remind them when we confirmed the booking.
If you were not notified at all by them before or after confirming the booking could you kindly write to me at [email protected]?
We want to note though that Katakana is not required before starting at the complete beginner class.
Also the other 2 students in your class were complete beginner level (some students have learned by themselves the alphabets and some basic words but are still complete beginners and cannot join a higher class). The curriculum was not modified at all for them and what you had is our regular complete beginner curriculum.
Learning how to read the hiragana alphabet (not to write it) can be done by oneself through multiple available apps and our Hiragana section in our website which has all the sounds as well with the voices of our teachers and quizzes.
As coming to Japan is a big investment for most of our students we want to start right away into the matter and not using the first class hours with the Hiragana alphabet. That system has made our complete beginner students improve faster and make the most of their time in Japan.
Most of our students are beginners and our curriculum is giving good results for them. We are actually not focused on intermediate students, therefore we are extremely sorry that in your case our curriculum didn't work.
We are very sorry that you thought that our materials were poor, we will look into it and improve them where needed.
Regarding the class sizes, yes they are small but adapted to the maximum number of students in class that is 8.
We are happy that you at least enjoy our culture classes.
We would had liked you to talk to us about this while you were at the school as we could have helped you right then. We apologize if you didn't feel that you could not do so as this is the opposite feeling we want to give.
We try to make our students as comfortable as possible and give them the confidence to talk with us anytime there is an issue or misunderstanding.
We have introduced since the end of January a "First impressions survey" for all our new students to express their issues and concerns right after finishing their first week in order to be able to act right away.
We are again very sorry that you didn't have a good experience with us. We take our students feedback very seriously and will make sure this misunderstanding does not happen anymore.
Yours sincerely,
Oscar
The teachers were amazing at teaching. The locations were extremely convinient. However the Tokyo location was hard to find. The classes were well structured and the class sizes were optimal if not a little small. My host family was amazing. You guys are awesome, thank you for this experience.
Xem chi tiết » Đọc tiếp...I like many things about Genkijacs, including the school facilities, location, teaching method, and professors, which is why I rate it 5 stars. Japan's culinary culture is incredible, with thousands of restaurants, but unfortunately, the time between classes is too short to explore these alternatives. However, I did have time to explore the restaurants in the afternoon :). The student attention at Genkijacs was excellent, and the staff helped me with all aspects of transport without any issues.
On the other hand, I was not satisfied with the quality of the department I was assigned to, despite its beautiful location. When I returned to Germany, I wrote to the school with photos to highlight the issues, and they assured me that they would investigate the matter with the service providers. Living in Kyoto was an experience for me, and the quality of the department was an essential part of that experience. If I had to pay double or triple to get better conditions, I would do it without hesitation. For my next visit, I will be more particular about the accommodation.
The teachers was very friendly and had different teaching styles.
It's for the most part fast paced learning. We went through around 2 chapters every week.
We followed the Minna no nihongo book.
With about a month interval there's a test we had to take. If you don't pass you may have to take the same month again.
We got homework every day (except weekends) but for the most part not to time-consuming.
But if you want more homework you can just ask
Some teachers are very zealous to teach such as Keigo San, Kanego San and Yasuko San. Some are not very full-heartedly.
Xem chi tiết » Đọc tiếp...The classes were tough and fast paced, but overall were extremely rewarding. I personally got frustrated at times because the classes are almost entirely done in Japanese and I could not understand what was going on because I was an Absolute Beginner. The teachers are very lovely and helpful. The location is central and great for post class activities.
Xem chi tiết » Đọc tiếp...Ở nhà dân được lựa chọn cẩn thận và cung cấp cho sinh viên cơ hội được học hỏi thêm về văn hóa bản địa trong một khung cảnh thoải mái đồng thời với học Tiếng Nhật !in Kyōto. Địa điểm nhà ở thường cách trường 40 - 90 phút đi bằng phương tiện công cộng. Các gia đình luôn có lịch ăn uống hợp lý cho phép bạn thưởng thức các món ăn địa phương. Nếu bạn có yêu cầu đặc biệt hoặc ăn kiêng (do tôn giáo hoặc lý do sức khỏe), xin vui lòng cho chúng tôi biết trước. Thời gian ở trọ của bạn bắt đầu được tính từ ngày Chủ nhật trước của ngày khai giảng lớp học cho đến hết ngày thứ Bảy sau ngày bế giảng lớp học trừ trường hợp ngoại lệ. Tìm hiểu thêm về loại hình ở cùng nhà dân
Homestay - Single-person room - Breakfast and dinner
Ký túc xá sinh viên thích hợp hơn đối với sinh viên độc lập, những người đang tìm kiếm nơi ở sạch sẽ, cơ bản với giá thành hạ. Tất cả sinh viên phải được 18+. Thời gian ở trọ của bạn bắt đầu được tính từ ngày Chủ nhật trước của ngày khai giảng lớp học cho đến hết ngày thứ Bảy sau ngày bế giảng lớp học trừ trường hợp ngoại lệ. Ký túc xá sinh viên thường không bao gồm các bữa ăn trong ngày. Tìm hiểu thêm về ký túc xác sinh viên
Kyoto Guesthouse
Bạn có thể thuê căn hộ riêng để ở trong quá trình học ở Kyoto, nhưng chi phí sẽ đắt đỏ hơn. GenkiJACS cung cấp dịch vụ trợ giúp trong việc thuê nhà riêng hoặc bạn có thể tự mình thuê nhà. Tìm hiểu thêm về thuê nhà riêng
Private apartment - Single-person room - No meals
Chúng tôi không thể thay mặt sinh viên để đăng ký visa. Tuy nhiên, trường học có thể cung cấp cho bạn tất cả các loại giấy tờ cần thiết, trợ giúp bạn xin visa.
Thư tiếp nhận của bạn sẽ được gửi đến địa chỉ nhà bạn theo đường gửi thư thông thường miễn phí. Nếu bạn muốn nhận được giấy tờ của mình theo đường chuyển phát nhanh, thì bạn sẽ phải trả thêm ¥ 6,500 khi thực hiện đăng ký.
Please note that we do not book flights for our students. If you are researching airfare costs, we recommend using Kayak.com, a search engine that lets you compare flight options from your home country to Kyōto based on your budget, schedule and preferences.
Yên tâm du học với chương trình bảo hiểm sức khỏe và trách nhiệm nhân sự của Language International. Khi bạn đặt khóa học thông qua chúng tôi, bạn có thể lựa chọn mua một gói bảo hiểm quốc tế không chỉ giúp bạn chi trả các chi phí chăm sóc sức khỏe, mà còn bảo vệ tài sản cá nhân của bạn. Bạn phải đánh dấu vào mục bảo hiểm tương ứng khi thực hiện đăng ký.
Có câu hỏi? Hãy nhận câu trả lời từ nhân viên và cựu sinh viên Genki Japanese and Culture School.
Đặt câu hỏiGenki Japanese and Culture School